The Skinny Food Co has launched a High Court claim against B&M, seeking nearly £14 million in damages. This legal action, which commenced in February, arises from allegations that Skinny was removed from B&M’s supplier list on two occasions, first in 2021 and again in 2025.

According to court filings, the initial de-listing allegedly occurred after investment talks between Robin Arora and Skinny fell through. The situation escalated when B&M ceased adding new Skinny products to its shelves starting in 2023, culminating in a formal notification in June 2025 that all remaining products would be removed by December 2025.

Skinny claims that total losses from both de-listings amount to at least £16.85 million. The company had invested over £235,000 in new machinery to meet the anticipated demand from B&M, which has since dwindled significantly. Orders from B&M plummeted from £10.7 million in the year ending August 2021 to approximately £3.2 million the following year.

Legal representatives for Skinny allege that Robin Arora made threatening remarks during the investment negotiations, suggesting that he had the power to ‘ruin’ Skinny’s business. George Spalton KC, representing Skinny, stated, “B&M’s decision to de-list Skinny was motivated at least by the breakdown of the negotiations between (Mr Arora) and Skinny in respect of the proposed investment by the Arora family in Skinny, and by (Mr Arora’s) desire to make good his threat to ‘ruin’ Skinny.”

As of now, B&M has yet to submit its defense in this ongoing case. The commercial relationship between Skinny and B&M began in late 2020, and the recent developments have raised significant concerns within the industry regarding supplier relations and the impact of investment negotiations on business partnerships.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the next steps in this legal battle, but the implications of this lawsuit could resonate throughout the retail and food sectors.

The post Skinny food b&m lawsuit: What is the About? appeared first on newscasino.

“Defendant Cosby used his enormous wealth, power, fame, and prestige, giving women like Ms. Motsinger access to a world of celebrities and entertainers,” stated the jury in their recent verdict against Bill Cosby.

A California jury found Bill Cosby guilty of sexual assault in a civil trial, awarding Donna Motsinger $19.25 million in damages. Motsinger alleged that Cosby drugged and raped her in 1972, an accusation that adds to the long history of allegations against the comedian.

During the trial, Motsinger recalled her harrowing experience, saying, “She woke up in her house with all her clothes off, except her underwear on — no top, no bra, and no pants. She knew she had been drugged and raped by Bill Cosby.” This testimony was pivotal in the jury’s decision.

Cosby, who did not testify during the trial, has faced numerous allegations of sexual misconduct from over 60 women over the years. His previous conviction in 2018 resulted in a three-year prison sentence, but he was released in 2021 after a higher court reversed that conviction.

Motsinger filed her case against Cosby in 2023, and after three days of jury deliberation, the verdict was reached. The significant damages awarded reflect the jury’s recognition of the impact of Cosby’s actions on Motsinger’s life.

Despite the ruling, Cosby is believed to be appealing the verdict, indicating that this legal battle may not be over. His net worth has reportedly decreased to about $200 million, down from a peak of $300-$400 million, reflecting the financial toll of ongoing legal issues.

As the case unfolds, it underscores the ongoing conversation about accountability for sexual assault and the challenges faced by survivors in seeking justice. Cosby’s history of sexual assault allegations dates back as far as six decades, making this verdict a significant moment in a long and contentious saga.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the next steps in the legal process, but the implications of this verdict are likely to resonate within the entertainment industry and beyond.

The post Bill cosby: What Does the Recent Verdict Mean for ? appeared first on newscasino.

What are the implications of Eni Aluko’s recent victory in her libel case against Joey Barton? The answer is significant: Aluko has won a ruling that not only vindicates her but also highlights the serious repercussions of online harassment. The High Court in London ordered Barton to pay £339,000 in damages and legal costs to Aluko, marking a pivotal moment in her two-year legal battle.

The case stemmed from a series of 48 posts that Barton published on his X account between January and August 2024, which Aluko argued constituted harassment. Gervase de Wilde, representing Aluko, stated, “Mr. Barton has now accepted that his campaign against Ms. Aluko amounted to harassment and that he should not have made the publications.” This acknowledgment underscores the court’s recognition of the damaging impact of Barton’s actions on Aluko’s life.

Aluko, who is 39 years old, expressed her relief and happiness following the court’s decision, stating, “I’m glad it’s the end.” Her legal team and supporters were thanked for their unwavering support throughout the lengthy process, which Aluko described as a “two-year marathon.” The ruling not only reflects the court’s stance on the matter but also serves as a warning against similar behavior in the future.

In a separate incident, Barton, now 43, was charged with Section 18 wounding with intent following an alleged assault, further complicating his legal troubles. Notably, Barton did not attend the court hearing where the judgment was delivered, raising questions about his commitment to addressing the allegations against him.

The High Court case was initially stayed, meaning proceedings were halted, but the recent ruling has brought it back into the spotlight. Barton has seven days to request a change to the court order, and the first £100,000 of the payment is due by March 24, 2026. This timeline adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing legal saga.

As the situation unfolds, the ramifications of this case extend beyond Aluko and Barton. It raises broader questions about the responsibilities of individuals on social media platforms and the potential consequences of online harassment. The legal landscape surrounding such issues continues to evolve, and this case may serve as a precedent for future disputes.

While Aluko’s victory is a significant milestone, details remain unconfirmed regarding Barton’s next steps and whether he will seek to alter the court’s decision. The outcome of this case will likely influence discussions about accountability in online discourse and the protection of individuals from harassment.

The post Eni Aluko Wins Libel Case Against Joey Barton appeared first on newscasino.